IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i6p606-d100706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Wang

    (School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning, China)

  • Qian Gao

    (School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning, China)

  • Yan Deng

    (Chinese Journal of Health Statistics Magazine, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning, China)

  • Rentong Chen

    (School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning, China)

  • Yang Liu

    (School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning, China)

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) is one of the environmental pathogenic factors causing skin damage. Aiming to assess the risk of face skin exposure to UV irradiance from different rotation angles, a rotating model was used to monitor the exposure of the skin on the face to UV irradiance, with skin damage action spectra used to determine the biologically effective UV irradiance (UVBE skin ) and UVBE skin radiant exposure (HBE skin ) causing skin damage. The results indicate that the UVBE skin is directly influenced by variations in rotation angles. A significant decrease of approximately 52.70% and 52.10% in UVBE skin was found when the cheek and nose measurement sites was rotated from 0° to 90°, while a decrease of approximately 62.70% was shown when the forehead measurement sites was rotated from an angle of 0° to 108°. When HBE skin was compared to the exposure limits (ELs; 30 J·m −2 ), the maximum relative risk ratios (RR) for cheek, nose, and forehead were found to be approximately 2.01, 2.40, and 2.90, respectively, which were all measured at a rotation angle of 0°. The maximal increase in the percentage of the average HBE skin for rotation angles of 60°, 120°, 180°, and 360° facing the sun to ELs were found to be approximately 62.10%, 52.72%, 43.43%, and 26.27% for the cheek; approximately 130.61%, 109.68%, 86.43%, and 50.06% for the nose; and approximately 178.61%, 159.19%, 134.38%, and 83.41% for the forehead, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Wang & Qian Gao & Yan Deng & Rentong Chen & Yang Liu, 2017. "Risk Assessment of Face Skin Exposure to UV Irradiance from Different Rotation Angle Ranges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:6:p:606-:d:100706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/6/606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/6/606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:6:p:606-:d:100706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.