IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i7p682-d73379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tai Chi versus Brisk Walking in Reducing Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Aileen W. K. Chan

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Janet W. H. Sit

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Sek Ying Chair

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Doris Y. P. Leung

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Diana T. F. Lee

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Eliza M. L. Wong

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Lawrence C. W. Fung

    (Physiotherapy Department, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Yaumatei, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Physical inactivity is one of the major modifiable lifestyle risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This protocol aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Tai Chi versus brisk walking in reducing CVD risk factors. This is a randomized controlled trial with three arms, namely, Tai Chi group, walking group, and control group. The Tai Chi group will receive Tai Chi training, which consists of two 60-min sessions each week for three months, and self-practice for 30 min every day. The walking group will perform brisk walking for 30 min every day. The control group will receive their usual care. 246 subjects with CVD risk factors will be recruited from two outpatient clinics. The primary outcome is blood pressure. Secondary outcomes include fasting blood for lipid profile, sugar and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); body mass index, waist circumference, body fat percentage; perceived stress level and quality of life. Data collections will be conducted at baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month. Generalized estimating equations model will be used to compare the changes in outcomes across time between groups. It is expected that both the Tai Chi and walking groups could maintain better health and have improved quality of life, and that Tai Chi will be more effective than brisk walking in reducing CVD risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Aileen W. K. Chan & Janet W. H. Sit & Sek Ying Chair & Doris Y. P. Leung & Diana T. F. Lee & Eliza M. L. Wong & Lawrence C. W. Fung, 2016. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tai Chi versus Brisk Walking in Reducing Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:682-:d:73379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/7/682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mei-Lan Chen & Stephanie B. Wotiz & Starr M. Banks & Sabine A. Connors & Yuyin Shi, 2021. "Dose-Response Association of Tai Chi and Cognition among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:7:p:682-:d:73379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.