IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i5p4714-4728d35610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from Community Mental Health to Drive Implementation in Health Care Systems for People with Long-Term Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Tansella

    (Department of Public Health and Community Medicine and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training inn Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy)

  • Graham Thornicroft

    (Health Service and Population Research Department, Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK)

  • Heidi Lempp

    (Clinical Trails Group/Academic Rheumatology, School of Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, 10, Cutcombe Rd., London SE5 9RJ, UK)

Abstract

This paper aims to identify which lessons learned from the evidence and the experiences accruing from the transformation in mental health services in recent decades may have relevance for the future development of healthcare for people with long-term physical conditions. First, nine principles are discussed which we first identified to guide mental health service organisation, and all of which can be potentially applied to long term care as well (autonomy, continuity, effectiveness, accessibility, comprehensiveness, equity, accountability, co-ordination, and efficiency). Second, we have outlined innovative operational aspects of service user participation, many of which were first initiated and consolidated in the mental health field, and some of which are now also being implemented in long term care (including case management, and crisis plans). We conclude that long term conditions, whether mental or physical, deserve a long-term commitment from the relevant health services, and indeed where continuity and co-ordination are properly funded implemented, this can ensure that the symptomatic course is more stable, quality of life is enhanced, and the clinical outcomes are more favourable. Innovations such as self-management for long-term conditions (intended to promote autonomy and empowerment) need to be subjected to the same level of rigorous scientific scrutiny as any other treatment or service interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Tansella & Graham Thornicroft & Heidi Lempp, 2014. "Lessons from Community Mental Health to Drive Implementation in Health Care Systems for People with Long-Term Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:5:p:4714-4728:d:35610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/4714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/4714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertil Lundberg & Lars Hansson & Elisabet Wentz & Tommy Björkman, 2008. "Stigma, Discrimination, Empowerment and Social Networks: a Preliminary Investigation of Their Influence On Subjective Quality of Life in a Swedish Sample," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(1), pages 47-55, January.
    2. Mary Cooke & Malcolm Campbell, 2014. "Comparing patient and professional views of expected treatment outcomes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Delphi study identifies possibilities for change in service delivery in England, UK," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1990-2002, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radosław Stupak & Bartłomiej Dobroczyński, 2021. "From Mental Health Industry to Humane Care. Suggestions for an Alternative Systemic Approach to Distress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Nerea Almeda & Carlos R. García-Alonso & José A. Salinas-Pérez & Mencía R. Gutiérrez-Colosía & Luis Salvador-Carulla, 2019. "Causal Modelling for Supporting Planning and Management of Mental Health Services and Systems: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Nick Bouras & George Ikkos & Thomas Craig, 2018. "From Community to Meta-Community Mental Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-10, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Argentzell & Christel Leufstadius & Mona Eklund, 2014. "Social interaction among people with psychiatric disabilities – Does attending a day centre matter?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(6), pages 519-527, September.
    2. Olga Valentim & Lídia Moutinho & Carlos Laranjeira & Ana Querido & Catarina Tomás & João Longo & Daniel Carvalho & João Gomes & Tânia Morgado & Tânia Correia, 2023. "“Looking beyond Mental Health Stigma”: An Online Focus Group Study among Senior Undergraduate Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ulrika Bejerholm & Tommy Björkman, 2011. "Empowerment in supported employment research and practice: Is it relevant?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(6), pages 588-595, November.
    4. Rikard Wärdig & Margareta Bachrach‐Lindström & Sally Hultsjö & Torbjörn Lindström & Anniqa Foldemo, 2015. "Persons with psychosis perceptions of participating in a lifestyle intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1815-1824, July.
    5. Viviane Piagentini Candal Setti & Alexandre Andrade Loch & Arlete Modelli & Cristiana Castanho de Almeida Rocca & Ines Hungerbuehler & Martinus Theodorus van de Bilt & Wagner Farid Gattaz & Wulf Röss, 2019. "Disclosing the diagnosis of schizophrenia: A pilot study of the ‘Coming Out Proud’ intervention," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(3), pages 244-251, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:5:p:4714-4728:d:35610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.