IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i2p1885-1903d32789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of the Intention to Implement a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention: Perceptions of Intermediaries

Author

Listed:
  • Denise Peels

    (Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, P.O. Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 DL, The Netherlands)

  • Aart Mudde

    (Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, P.O. Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 DL, The Netherlands)

  • Catherine Bolman

    (Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, P.O. Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 DL, The Netherlands)

  • Rianne Golsteijn

    (Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, P.O. Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 DL, The Netherlands)

  • Hein De Vries

    (Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands
    Care and Public Health Research Institute (Caphri), Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands)

  • Lilian Lechner

    (Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, P.O. Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 DL, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The public health impact of health behaviour interventions is highly dependent on large-scale implementation. Intermediaries—intervention providers—determine to a large extent whether an intervention reaches the target population, and hence its impact on public health. A cross-sectional study was performed to identify the correlates of intermediaries’ intention to implement a computer-tailored physical activity intervention. According to theory, potential correlates are intervention characteristics, organisational characteristics, socio-political characteristics and intermediary characteristics. This study investigated whether intermediary characteristics mediated the association between the intervention, organisational and socio-political characteristics and intention to implement the intervention. Results showed that intervention characteristics ( i.e. , observability (B = 0.53; p = 0.006); relative advantage (B = 0.79; p = 0.020); complexity (B = 0.80; p < 0.001); compatibility (B = 0.70; p < 0.001)), organisational characteristics ( i.e. , type of organization (B = 0.38; p = 0.002); perceived task responsibility (B = 0.66; p ≤ 0.001); capacity (B = 0.83; p < 0.001)), and the social support received by intermediary organisations (B = 0.81; p < 0.001) were associated with intention to implement the intervention. These factors should thus be targeted by an implementation strategy. Since self-efficacy and social norms perceived by the intermediary organisations partially mediated the effects of other variables on intention to implement the intervention (varying between 29% and 84%), these factors should be targeted to optimise the effectiveness of the implementation strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Denise Peels & Aart Mudde & Catherine Bolman & Rianne Golsteijn & Hein De Vries & Lilian Lechner, 2014. "Correlates of the Intention to Implement a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention: Perceptions of Intermediaries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:1885-1903:d:32789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/1885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/1885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriella M. McLoughlin & Hannah G. Calvert & Lindsey Turner, 2023. "Individual and Contextual Factors Associated with Classroom Teachers’ Intentions to Implement Classroom Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:1885-1903:d:32789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.