IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgames/v13y2022i4p52-d876060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RewardRating : A Mechanism Design Approach to Improve Rating Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Iman Vakilinia

    (School of Computing, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
    Current address: John E.Mathews Jr. Computer Science, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.)

  • Peyman Faizian

    (Department of Computer Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA)

  • Mohammad Mahdi Khalili

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)

Abstract

Nowadays, rating systems play a crucial role in the attraction of customers to different services. However, as it is difficult to detect a fake rating, fraudulent users can potentially unfairly impact the rating’s aggregated score. This fraudulent behavior can negatively affect customers and businesses. To improve rating systems, in this paper, we take a novel mechanism-design approach to increase the cost of fake ratings while providing incentives for honest ratings. However, designing such a mechanism is a challenging task, as it is not possible to detect fake ratings since raters might rate a same service differently. Our proposed mechanism RewardRating is inspired by the stock market model in which users can invest in their ratings for services and receive a reward on the basis of future ratings. We leverage the fact that, if a service’s rating is affected by a fake rating, then the aggregated rating is biased toward the direction of the fake rating. First, we formally model the problem and discuss budget-balanced and incentive-compatibility specifications. Then, we suggest a profit-sharing scheme to cover the rating system’s requirements. Lastly, we analyze the performance of our proposed mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Iman Vakilinia & Peyman Faizian & Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, 2022. "RewardRating : A Mechanism Design Approach to Improve Rating Systems," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:13:y:2022:i:4:p:52-:d:876060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/13/4/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/13/4/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:13:y:2022:i:4:p:52-:d:876060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.