IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v7y2015i4p484-499d60884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Teacher Effectiveness: Designing Better Assessment Tools in Learning Management Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Dov Kruger

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Sarah Inman

    (Instructional Technology, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Zhiyu Ding

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Yijin Kang

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Poornima Kuna

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Yujie Liu

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Xiakun Lu

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Stephen Oro

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

  • Yingzhu Wang

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA)

Abstract

Current-generation assessment tools used in K-12 and post-secondary education are limited in the type of questions they support; this limitation makes it difficult for instructors to navigate their assessment engines. Furthermore, the question types tend to score low on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Dedicated learning management systems (LMS) such as Blackboard, Moodle and Canvas are somewhat better than informal tools as they offer more question types and some randomization. Still, question types in all the major LMS assessment engines are limited. Additionally, LMSs place a heavy burden on teachers to generate online assessments. In this study we analyzed the top three LMS providers to identify inefficiencies. These inefficiencies in LMS design, point us to ways to ask better questions. Our findings show that teachers have not adopted current tools because they do not offer definitive improvements in productivity. Therefore, we developed LiquiZ, a design for a next-generation assessment engine that reduces user effort and provides more advanced question types that allow teachers to ask questions that can currently only be asked in one-on-one demonstration. The initial LiquiZ project is targeted toward STEM subjects, so the question types are particularly advantageous in math or science subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Dov Kruger & Sarah Inman & Zhiyu Ding & Yijin Kang & Poornima Kuna & Yujie Liu & Xiakun Lu & Stephen Oro & Yingzhu Wang, 2015. "Improving Teacher Effectiveness: Designing Better Assessment Tools in Learning Management Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:484-499:d:60884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/7/4/484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/7/4/484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:484-499:d:60884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.