IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2023i1p12-d1309732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Embeddings from Pre-Trained Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Educational Content Recommendation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiu Li

    (Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, NOD-Huset, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, 16455 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Aron Henriksson

    (Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, NOD-Huset, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, 16455 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Martin Duneld

    (Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, NOD-Huset, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, 16455 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Jalal Nouri

    (Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, NOD-Huset, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, 16455 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Yongchao Wu

    (Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, NOD-Huset, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, 16455 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

Educational content recommendation is a cornerstone of AI-enhanced learning. In particular, to facilitate navigating the diverse learning resources available on learning platforms, methods are needed for automatically linking learning materials, e.g., in order to recommend textbook content based on exercises. Such methods are typically based on semantic textual similarity (STS) and the use of embeddings for text representation. However, it remains unclear what types of embeddings should be used for this task. In this study, we carry out an extensive empirical evaluation of embeddings derived from three different types of models: (i) static embeddings trained using a concept-based knowledge graph, (ii) contextual embeddings from a pre-trained language model, and (iii) contextual embeddings from a large language model (LLM). In addition to evaluating the models individually, various ensembles are explored based on different strategies for combining two models in an early vs. late fusion fashion. The evaluation is carried out using digital textbooks in Swedish for three different subjects and two types of exercises. The results show that using contextual embeddings from an LLM leads to superior performance compared to the other models, and that there is no significant improvement when combining these with static embeddings trained using a knowledge graph. When using embeddings derived from a smaller language model, however, it helps to combine them with knowledge graph embeddings. The performance of the best-performing model is high for both types of exercises, resulting in a mean Recall@3 of 0.96 and 0.95 and a mean MRR of 0.87 and 0.86 for quizzes and study questions, respectively, demonstrating the feasibility of using STS based on text embeddings for educational content recommendation. The ability to link digital learning materials in an unsupervised manner—relying only on readily available pre-trained models—facilitates the development of AI-enhanced learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiu Li & Aron Henriksson & Martin Duneld & Jalal Nouri & Yongchao Wu, 2023. "Evaluating Embeddings from Pre-Trained Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Educational Content Recommendation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:12-:d:1309732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/1/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/1/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:12-:d:1309732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.