IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v12y2020i6p108-d375458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology to Evaluate Standards and Platforms within Cyber Threat Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra de Melo e Silva

    (Post Graduation in Electrical Engineering (PPEE), Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • João José Costa Gondim

    (Post Graduation in Electrical Engineering (PPEE), Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
    Department of Computer Science (CIC), University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia-DF 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Robson de Oliveira Albuquerque

    (Post Graduation in Electrical Engineering (PPEE), Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
    Group of Analysis, Security and Systems (GASS), Department of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (DISIA), Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Office 431, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Calle Profesor José García Santesmases, 9, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Luis Javier García Villalba

    (Group of Analysis, Security and Systems (GASS), Department of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (DISIA), Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Office 431, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Calle Profesor José García Santesmases, 9, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The cyber security landscape is fundamentally changing over the past years. While technology is evolving and new sophisticated applications are being developed, a new threat scenario is emerging in alarming proportions. Sophisticated threats with multi-vectored, multi-staged and polymorphic characteristics are performing complex attacks, making the processes of detection and mitigation far more complicated. Thus, organizations were encouraged to change their traditional defense models and to use and to develop new systems with a proactive approach. Such changes are necessary because the old approaches are not effective anymore to detect advanced attacks. Also, the organizations are encouraged to develop the ability to respond to incidents in real-time using complex threat intelligence platforms. However, since the field is growing rapidly, today Cyber Threat Intelligence concept lacks a consistent definition and a heterogeneous market has emerged, including diverse systems and tools, with different capabilities and goals. This work aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation methodology of threat intelligence standards and cyber threat intelligence platforms. The proposed methodology is based on the selection of the most relevant candidates to establish the evaluation criteria. In addition, this work studies the Cyber Threat Intelligence ecosystem and Threat Intelligence standards and platforms existing in state-of-the-art.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra de Melo e Silva & João José Costa Gondim & Robson de Oliveira Albuquerque & Luis Javier García Villalba, 2020. "A Methodology to Evaluate Standards and Platforms within Cyber Threat Intelligence," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:108-:d:375458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/6/108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/6/108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:108-:d:375458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.