IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v12y2020i4p73-d347279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is an Open IoT Platform? Insights from a Systematic Mapping Study

Author

Listed:
  • Bahtijar Vogel

    (Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
    Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden)

  • Yuji Dong

    (Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
    Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden)

  • Blerim Emruli

    (Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
    Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
    Department of Informatics, Lund University, 22363 Lund, Sweden)

  • Paul Davidsson

    (Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
    Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden)

  • Romina Spalazzese

    (Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
    Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden)

Abstract

Today, the Internet of Things (IoT) is mainly associated with vertically integrated systems that often are closed and fragmented in their applicability. To build a better IoT ecosystem, the open IoT platform has become a popular term in the recent years. However, this term is usually used in an intuitive way without clarifying the openness aspects of the platforms. The goal of this paper is to characterize the openness types of IoT platforms and investigate what makes them open. We conducted a systematic mapping study by retrieving data from 718 papers. As a result of applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 221 papers were selected for review. We discovered 46 IoT platforms that have been characterized as open, whereas 25 platforms are referred as open by some studies rather than the platforms themselves. We found that the most widely accepted and used open IoT platforms are NodeMCU and ThingSpeak that together hold a share of more than 70% of the declared open IoT platforms in the selected papers. The openness of an IoT platform is interpreted into different openness types. Our study results show that the most common openness type encountered in open IoT platforms is open-source, but also open standards, open APIs, open data and open layers are used in the literature. Finally, we propose a new perspective on how to define openness in the context of IoT platforms by providing several insights from the different stakeholder viewpoints.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahtijar Vogel & Yuji Dong & Blerim Emruli & Paul Davidsson & Romina Spalazzese, 2020. "What Is an Open IoT Platform? Insights from a Systematic Mapping Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:73-:d:347279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/4/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/4/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pereira, Vijay & Bamel, Umesh & Temouri, Yama & Budhwar, Pawan & Del Giudice, Manlio, 2023. "Mapping the evolution, current state of affairs and future research direction of managing cross-border knowledge for innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:73-:d:347279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.