IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i23p7733-d1286301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on the Improvement of Film Cooling Effectiveness of Various Modified Configurations Based on a Fan-Shaped Film Cooling Hole on an Endwall

Author

Listed:
  • Seokmin Kim

    (Aerospace System Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Gajeong-Ro 217, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea)

  • DongEun Lee

    (Aerospace System Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Gajeong-Ro 217, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea)

  • Young Seok Kang

    (Aeropropulsion Research Division, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Gwahak-Ro 169-84, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34133, Republic of Korea)

  • Dong-Ho Rhee

    (Aeropropulsion Research Division, Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Gwahak-Ro 169-84, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34133, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Several studies have previously been conducted to improve the cooling performance of film cooling. However, most of the research has conducted experiments with film cooling holes on flat plates, and thus, the results of these studies do not encompass the influence of the complex mainstream behavior within the turbine passage on film cooling. In this study, three different film cooling hole configurations were installed on the endwall of a turbine linear cascade to measure adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and evaluate cooling performance. The film cooling holes compared in the experiment for film cooling effectiveness were a 7-7-7 fan-shaped hole (Baseline), a Baseline with a double-step structure at the hole exit (Staircase), and a Baseline with an additional expanded passage at the hole leading edge (Compound Expansion). A total of nine holes were manufactured on the turbine endwall to assess film cooling performance, as various factors, such as mainstream acceleration, secondary flow within the turbine passage, and so on, can influence film cooling. Adiabatic film cooling effectiveness was measured using the pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) technique. Mass flow ratios ranging from 0.25% to 1.25% of the mass flow rate of a single turbine passage were supplied to the plenum chamber within the test rig. As a result, all experimental results confirmed the impact of secondary flow within the turbine passage on film cooling. In the case of the Staircase, it exhibits an overall cooling trend similar to the Baseline. It shows small cooling performance degradation compared with Baseline due to lift-off, and its double-step structure laterally expanding results in better cooling performance at high mass flow ratio (MFR) conditions. For the Compound Expansion, at low MFR, the momentum of the coolant is lower compared with other configurations, leading to lower cooling performance due to the influence of secondary flow. However, at high MFR, the Compound Expansion provides wider protection compared with other hole geometries and shows high cooling performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Seokmin Kim & DongEun Lee & Young Seok Kang & Dong-Ho Rhee, 2023. "Experimental Study on the Improvement of Film Cooling Effectiveness of Various Modified Configurations Based on a Fan-Shaped Film Cooling Hole on an Endwall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7733-:d:1286301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:23:p:7733-:d:1286301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.