Author
Listed:
- Xinyi Niu
(College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Jianquan Liu
(College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Zenghao Dong
(College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Jie Wei
(College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Wenlong Zhou
(College of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
Abstract
Changes in temperature during reactor operation may cause changes in physical parameters, leading to core overheating and accidents. It is essential to analyze and assess the safety parameters of the core under different operating conditions. This paper investigates the effects of fuel temperature, moderator density, boron concentration, and control rod state on AP1000 safety parameters. The study uses RMC and NJOY to calculate the changes in reactivity factor, effective delayed neutron fraction, and neutron generation time of the AP1000 reactor under different operating conditions. The changes in reactivity coefficients, neutron fluxes, and relative power densities of AP1000 reactors are analyzed for normal and accidental operating conditions. The results indicated that the reactivity coefficient remained negative under accident conditions, which ensured the safe operation of the reactor. The delayed neutron fraction, neutron flux, and power density distributions are affected by fuel temperature, moderator density, and control rod position. The control rod worth was sufficient for the emergency shutdown of the reactor under accidental conditions. It is demonstrated that the operation of the AP1000 reactor under study conditions is safe and controllable.
Suggested Citation
Xinyi Niu & Jianquan Liu & Zenghao Dong & Jie Wei & Wenlong Zhou, 2023.
"Research on Neutronics Safety Parameters of the AP1000 Nuclear Reactor under Different Conditions,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7549-:d:1278954
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7549-:d:1278954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.