IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i16p5997-d1218199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Numerical Study on Labyrinth Screw Pump (LSP) Performance under Viscous Fluid Flow

Author

Listed:
  • Wenqi Ke

    (State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China
    China Petrochemical Corporation, Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Hao Zeng

    (State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China
    China Petrochemical Corporation, Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Zhuoyu Wang

    (College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Hong Yu

    (College of Elementary Medicine, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063000, China)

  • Yaxin Liu

    (McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA)

  • Danzhu Zheng

    (McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA)

  • Jianjun Zhu

    (College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
    McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA)

  • Haiwen Zhu

    (College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
    McDougall School of Petroleum Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA)

Abstract

In this study, fluid viscosity effects on LSP performance in terms of boosting pressure were numerically investigated. A water–glycerin mixture with different concentrations corresponding to varying apparent viscosities was flowed through an in-house manufactured LSP under various flow conditions, e.g., changing flow rates, rotational speeds, and fluid viscosities. The pressure increment between the intake and discharge of the LSP was recorded using the differential pressure transducer. The same pump geometries, fluid properties and flow conditions were incorporated into the numerical configurations, where three-dimensional (3D), steady-state, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with a standard SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model were solved by a commercial CFD code. With the high-quality poly-hexcore grids, the simulated pressure increment was compared with the corresponding experimental measurement. The internal flow structures and characteristics within the cavities contained by the LSP impeller and diffuser were also analyzed. The good agreement between the numerical results against the experimental data verified the methodology adopted in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenqi Ke & Hao Zeng & Zhuoyu Wang & Hong Yu & Yaxin Liu & Danzhu Zheng & Jianjun Zhu & Haiwen Zhu, 2023. "A Numerical Study on Labyrinth Screw Pump (LSP) Performance under Viscous Fluid Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5997-:d:1218199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/16/5997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/16/5997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Abraham & Lijing Cheng & John Gorman, 2024. "CFD Simulation Models and Diffusion Models for Predicting Carbon Dioxide Plumes following Tank and Pipeline Ruptures—Laboratory Test and a Real-World Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Marcella Calabrese & Maria Portarapillo & Alessandra Di Nardo & Virginia Venezia & Maria Turco & Giuseppina Luciani & Almerinda Di Benedetto, 2024. "Hydrogen Safety Challenges: A Comprehensive Review on Production, Storage, Transport, Utilization, and CFD-Based Consequence and Risk Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:16:p:5997-:d:1218199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.