Pressure Measurements for Monitoring CO 2 Foam Pilots

This study focuses on the use of pressure measurements to monitor the effectiveness of foam as a CO 2 mobility control agent in oil-producing reservoirs. When it is applied optimally, foam has excellent potential to improve reservoir sweep efficiency, as well as CO 2 utilization and storage, during CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes. In this study, we present part of an integrated and novel workflow involving laboratory measurements, reservoir modeling and monitoring. Using the recorded bottom-hole pressure data from a CO 2 foam pilot study, we demonstrate how transient pressures could be used to monitor CO 2 foam development inside the reservoir. Results from a recent CO 2 foam pilot study in a heterogeneous carbonate field in Permian Basin, USA, are presented. The injection pressure was used to evaluate the development of foam during various foam injection cycles. A high-resolution radial simulator was utilized to study the effect of foam on well injectivity, as well as on CO 2 mobility in the reservoir during the surfactant-alternating gas (SAG) process. Transient analysis indicated constant temperature behavior during all SAG cycles. On the other hand, differential pressures consistently increased during the surfactant injection and decreased during the subsequent CO 2 injection periods. Pressure buildup during the periods of surfactant injection indicated the development of a reduced mobility zone in the reservoir. The radial model proved to be useful to assess the reservoir foam strength during this pilot study. Transient analysis revealed that the differential pressures during the SAG cycles were higher than the pressures observed during the water-alternating gas (WAG) cycle which, in turn, showed foam generation and reduced CO 2 mobility in the reservoir. Although pressure data are a powerful indicator of foam strength, additional measurements may be required to describe the complex physics of in situ foam generation. In this pilot study, it appeared that the reservoir foam strength was weaker than that expected in the laboratory.