IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7461-d938686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fractal Dimension of Digital 3D Rock Models with Different Pore Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobin Li

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, China University of Geosciences, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Wei Wei

    (Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, China University of Geosciences, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jianchao Cai

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, China University of Geosciences, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430074, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

The macroscopic physical properties of rocks are profoundly determined by their microstructure, and the research of accurately characterizing rock pore structure has been extensively carried out in the fields of petroleum engineering and geoscience. Fractal geometry is an effective means of quantitatively estimating the pore structure properties of porous media. In this study, the evolution law of the fractal dimension and the quantitative relationship between the fractal dimension and porosity were investigated based on the digital 3D rock models. First, three kinds of models with gradually changing pore structures, namely sedimentation, compaction, and cementation, were systematically reconstructed by the process-based approach. Then, the fractal dimensions of the skeleton, pore, and surface of the models were computed and analyzed. Finally, the relationships among the fractal dimension, porosity, and complexity were explored qualitatively. These works reveal the changing laws of three types of fractal dimensions for different pore structure models. The pore structure differences in sedimentation model can only be distinguished by the surface fractal dimension, while both pore and surface fractal dimensions are available parameters for characterizing different pore structures in compaction and cementation models. The quantitative relations between box-counting fractal dimension and porosity were established, which can be expressed by combining linear and logarithmic formulas. The comparison of fractal dimensions of compaction and cementation models proves that fractal dimensions can distinguish the subtle pore structure differences in digital 3D rock models. Understanding the evolution law between the fractal dimension and pore structure parameters provides more references for classifying and evaluating rock pore structure features using fractal dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobin Li & Wei Wei & Lei Wang & Jianchao Cai, 2022. "Fractal Dimension of Digital 3D Rock Models with Different Pore Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7461-:d:938686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biswal, B. & Manwart, C. & Hilfer, R. & Bakke, S. & Øren, P.E., 1999. "Quantitative analysis of experimental and synthetic microstructures for sedimentary rock," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 452-475.
    2. Penghui Su & Zhaohui Xia & Ping Wang & Wei Ding & Yunpeng Hu & Wenqi Zhang & Yujie Peng, 2019. "Fractal and Multifractal Analysis of Pore Size Distribution in Low Permeability Reservoirs Based on Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilfer, R., 2006. "Macroscopic capillarity without a constitutive capillary pressure function," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 371(2), pages 209-225.
    2. Mehrdad Massoudi, 2020. "Mathematical Modeling of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Petroleum Industries and Geothermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-4, March.
    3. Tscheschel, A. & Stoyan, D. & Hilfer, R., 2000. "Erosion–dilation analysis for experimental and synthetic microstructures of sedimentary rock," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 46-58.
    4. Latief, F.D.E. & Biswal, B. & Fauzi, U. & Hilfer, R., 2010. "Continuum reconstruction of the pore scale microstructure for Fontainebleau sandstone," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(8), pages 1607-1618.
    5. Haifei Lin & Yang Bai & Jingting Bu & Shugang Li & Min Yan & Pengxiang Zhao & Lei Qin, 2019. "Comprehensive Fractal Model and Pore Structural Features of Medium- and Low-Rank Coal from the Zhunnan Coalfield of Xinjiang, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Qingshun Gong & Zhanguo Liu & Chao Zhu & Bo Wang & Yijie Jin & Zhenghao Shi & Lin Xie & Jin Wu, 2023. "Heterogeneity of a Sandy Conglomerate Reservoir in Qie12 Block, Qaidam Basin, Northwest China and Its Influence on Remaining Oil Distribution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Marina V Karsanina & Kirill M Gerke & Elena B Skvortsova & Dirk Mallants, 2015. "Universal Spatial Correlation Functions for Describing and Reconstructing Soil Microstructure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Manwart, C. & Hilfer, R., 2002. "Numerical simulation of creeping fluid flow in reconstruction models of porous media," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 706-713.
    9. Xing Zeng & Weiqiang Li & Jue Hou & Wenqi Zhao & Yunyang Liu & Yongbo Kang, 2022. "Fractal Characteristics of Pore-Throats Structure and Quality Evaluation of Carbonate Reservoirs in Eastern Margin of Pre-Caspian Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7461-:d:938686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.