IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p12-d707557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Main Trends and Criteria Adopted in Economic Feasibility Studies of Offshore Wind Energy: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur Leandro Guerra Pires

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering and Systems, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Paulo Rotella Junior

    (Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Sandra Naomi Morioka

    (Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Luiz Célio Souza Rocha

    (Management Department, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology—North of Minas Gerais, Almenara 39900-000, Brazil)

  • Ivan Bolis

    (Department of Psychology, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Offshore wind energy has been identified as one of the most promising and increasingly attractive sources of energy. This technology offers a long-term power-generation source, less environmental impact, and fewer physical restrictions. However, given the complexity of this technology, economic feasibility studies are essential. Thus, this study aims to identify the main trends and criteria or the methods used in the economic feasibility studies of offshore wind energy, providing a review of the state of the art in this literature. For this, a Systematic Literature Review was carried out. The article shows the growing interest in offshore wind power generation and highlights how recently the interest in the studies that assess the technical–economic feasibility of this source has grown; it presents the main milestones of the topic. Based on a structured literature review, this article identifies the main trends in this topic: ( i ) wind farms, ( ii ) risk, ( iii ) floating offshore wind farms, ( iv ) decommissioning and repowering, ( v ) net present value, ( vi ) life cycle cost, and ( vii ) multi-criteria decision-making; it provides a broad view of the methodological possibilities and specificities for investors and researchers interested in conducting studies on the economic feasibility of offshore wind generation. In addition, finally, a research agenda is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur Leandro Guerra Pires & Paulo Rotella Junior & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Ivan Bolis, 2021. "Main Trends and Criteria Adopted in Economic Feasibility Studies of Offshore Wind Energy: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:12-:d:707557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kubule & Jānis Kramens & Madara Bimbere & Nerijus Pedišius & Dagnija Blumberga, 2024. "Trends for Stirling Engines in Households: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Karel Janda & Eva Michalikova & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Paulo Rotella Junior & Barbora Schererova & David Zilberman, 2022. "Review of the Impact of Biofuels on U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Adalberto Ospino Castro & Carlos Robles-Algarín & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Yecid Muñoz Maldonado & Amanda Mangones Cordero, 2023. "Feasibility Analysis of Offshore Wind Power Projects in the Caribbean Region of Colombia: A Case Study Using FAHP–GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Anna Manuella Melo Nunes & Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior & Raphael Abrahão & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & Flávio José Simioni & Paulo Rotella Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha, 2023. "Public Policies for Renewable Energy: A Review of the Perspectives for a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:12-:d:707557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.