IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i4p579-d96592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective History Matching with a Proxy Model for the Characterization of Production Performances at the Shale Gas Reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Jaejun Kim

    (Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Joe M. Kang

    (Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Changhyup Park

    (Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Kangwon 24341, Korea)

  • Yongjun Park

    (POSCO Daewoo Corporation, Incheon 21998, Korea)

  • Jihye Park

    (POSCO Daewoo Corporation, Incheon 21998, Korea)

  • Seojin Lim

    (AJU Global, Seoul 06626, Korea)

Abstract

This paper presents a fast, reliable multi-objective history-matching method based on proxy modeling to forecast the production performances of shale gas reservoirs for which all available post-hydraulic-fracturing production data, i.e., the daily gas rate and cumulative-production volume until the given date, are honored. The developed workflow consists of distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis (DGSA) to determine the spatiotemporal-parameter significance, fast marching method (FMM) as a proxy model, and a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to integrate the dynamic data. The model validation confirms that the FMM is a sound surrogate model working within an error of approximately 2% for the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR), and it is 11 times faster than a full-reservoir simulation. The predictive accuracy on future production after matching 1.5-year production histories is assessed to examine the applicability of the proposed method. The DGSA determines the effective parameters with respect to the gas rate and the cumulative volume, including fracture permeability, fracture half-length, enhanced permeability in the stimulated reservoir volume, and average post-fracturing porosity. A comparison of the prediction accuracy for single-objective optimization shows that the proposed method accurately estimates the recoverable volume as well as the production profiles to within an error of 0.5%, while the single-objective consideration reveals the scale-dependency problem with lesser accuracy. The results of this study are useful to overcome the time-consuming effort of using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and full-scale reservoir simulation as well as to conduct a more-realistic prediction of the shale gas reserves and the corresponding production performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaejun Kim & Joe M. Kang & Changhyup Park & Yongjun Park & Jihye Park & Seojin Lim, 2017. "Multi-Objective History Matching with a Proxy Model for the Characterization of Production Performances at the Shale Gas Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:579-:d:96592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/4/579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jia Liu & Jianguo Wang & Chunfai Leung & Feng Gao, 2018. "A Multi-Parameter Optimization Model for the Evaluation of Shale Gas Recovery Enhancement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Kyoungsu Kim & Jonggeun Choe, 2019. "Hydraulic Fracture Design with a Proxy Model for Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoir with Considering Feasibility Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. He, Yifan & Aranha, Claus & Hallam, Antony & Chassagne, Romain, 2022. "Optimization of subsurface models with multiple criteria using Lexicase Selection," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:579-:d:96592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.