IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v8y2023i8p126-d1206977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Datasets of Simulated Exhaled Aerosol Images from Normal and Diseased Lungs with Multi-Level Similarities for Neural Network Training/Testing and Continuous Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Talaat

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, USA)

  • Xiuhua Si

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA 92504, USA)

  • Jinxiang Xi

    (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, USA)

Abstract

Although exhaled aerosols and their patterns may seem chaotic in appearance, they inherently contain information related to the underlying respiratory physiology and anatomy. This study presented a multi-level database of simulated exhaled aerosol images from both normal and diseased lungs. An anatomically accurate mouth-lung geometry extending to G9 was modified to model two stages of obstructions in small airways and physiology-based simulations were utilized to capture the fluid-particle dynamics and exhaled aerosol images from varying breath tests. The dataset was designed to test two performance metrics of convolutional neural network (CNN) models when used for transfer learning: interpolation and extrapolation. To this aim, three testing datasets with decreasing image similarities were developed (i.e., level 1, inbox, and outbox). Four network models (AlexNet, ResNet-50, MobileNet, and EfficientNet) were tested and the performances of all models decreased for the outbox test images, which were outside the design space. The effect of continuous learning was also assessed for each model by adding new images into the training dataset and the newly trained network was tested at multiple levels. Among the four network models, ResNet-50 excelled in performance in both multi-level testing and continuous learning, the latter of which enhanced the accuracy of the most challenging classification task (i.e., 3-class with outbox test images) from 60.65% to 98.92%. The datasets can serve as a benchmark training/testing database for validating existent CNN models or quantifying the performance metrics of new CNN models.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Talaat & Xiuhua Si & Jinxiang Xi, 2023. "Datasets of Simulated Exhaled Aerosol Images from Normal and Diseased Lungs with Multi-Level Similarities for Neural Network Training/Testing and Continuous Learning," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:8:p:126-:d:1206977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/8/126/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/8/126/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinxiang Xi & Xiuhua A Si & JongWon Kim & Edward Mckee & En-Bing Lin, 2014. "Exhaled Aerosol Pattern Discloses Lung Structural Abnormality: A Sensitivity Study Using Computational Modeling and Fractal Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinxiang Xi & Weizhong Zhao & Jiayao Eddie Yuan & JongWon Kim & Xiuhua Si & Xiaowei Xu, 2015. "Detecting Lung Diseases from Exhaled Aerosols: Non-Invasive Lung Diagnosis Using Fractal Analysis and SVM Classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Jinxiang Xi & Weizhong Zhao, 2019. "Correlating exhaled aerosol images to small airway obstructive diseases: A study with dynamic mode decomposition and machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:8:p:126-:d:1206977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.