IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v8y2023i6p104-d1169835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Predicting Structural Deformation of Tunnels during Operation Period

Author

Listed:
  • Chuangfeng Duan

    (School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
    Shanghai Urban-Construction Information Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
    SHU-SUCG Research Centre for Building Industrialization, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China)

  • Min Hu

    (SHU-SUCG Research Centre for Building Industrialization, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
    SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China)

  • Haozuan Zhang

    (SHU-SUCG Research Centre for Building Industrialization, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
    SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China)

Abstract

Accurately predicting the structural deformation trend of tunnels during operation is significant to improve the scientificity of tunnel safety maintenance. With the development of data science, structural deformation prediction methods based on time-series data have attracted attention. Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average model (ARIMA) is a classical statistical analysis model, which is suitable for processing non-stationary time-series data. Long- and Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is a special cyclic neural network that can learn long-term dependent information in time series. Both are widely used in the field of temporal prediction. In view of the lack of time-series prediction in the tunnel deformation field, the body of this paper uses historical data of the Xinjian Road and the Dalian Road tunnel in Shanghai to propose a new way of modeling based on single points and road sections. ARIMA and LSTM models are applied in comprehensive experiments, and the results show that: (1) Both LSTM and ARIMA models have great performance for settlement and convergence deformation. (2) The overall robustness of ARIMA is better than that of LSTM, and it is more adaptable to the datasets. (3) The model prediction performance is closely related to the data quality. ARIMA has more stable performance under the lack of data volume, while LSTM has better performance with high-quality data and higher upper limit.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuangfeng Duan & Min Hu & Haozuan Zhang, 2023. "Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Predicting Structural Deformation of Tunnels during Operation Period," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:6:p:104-:d:1169835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/6/104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/6/104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:6:p:104-:d:1169835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.