IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p393-d1349232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra De Carolis

    (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)

  • Adam J. Newmark

    (Department of Government and Justice Studies, Appalachian State University, 287 Rivers St., Boone, NC 28608, USA)

  • Jieun Kim

    (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy)

  • Junxia Song

    (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Pietropaoli

    (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)

  • Veronica Manara

    (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Gyorffy

    (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)

  • Joseph Cazier

    (Department of Information Systems, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Giovanni Formato

    (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background/Objectives : In a collaborative effort, FAO, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Association “Apimondia”, the Appalachian State University, and the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e Toscana (IZSLT), the FAO Reference Centre for Animal Health and Food Security Discipline Apiculture, health, and biosecurity, designed an online international survey (“Knowledge, Awareness and Practice”-KAP) as a risk assessment tool to validate biosecurity measures able to prevent and control the main honeybee ( Apis mellifera subsp.) infectious diseases. Methods : The KAP survey was disseminated through various channels for 14 months (January 2019–March 2020). Beekeepers’ knowledge on nosemosis, American foulbrood (AFB), and European foulbrood (EFB) management was assessed. Beekeepers’ attitudes were investigated by asking them to provide a score called “Acceptance by beekeepers”. Results : Of the 410 respondents, the majority of them (68.3%, n = 252) were from Europe. European beekeepers (n = 252) considered “Highly acceptable” the following practices: removing combs that show signs of dysentery and feeding colonies for nosemosis; the quick identification and management of affected hives for American foulbrood and European foulbrood. Instead, the following practices were considered as not acceptable by beekeepers: for nosemosis, the use of antibiotics and sampling of hive debris for early detection; for American foulbrood and European foulbrood, the shook swarm, the destruction of the whole apiary, as well as their treatment with antibiotics. Conclusion : This study demonstrated the validity of the present “Knowledge, Awareness and Practice” (KAP) survey to validate the best practices for the main infectious honeybee diseases, considering the pragmatic point of view of beekeepers. Sustainable practices for disease control are preferred by the European beekeepers. While having an adequate knowledge base for the early detection of the investigated honeybee diseases, European beekeepers tend to be aware of the health status of their hives, embracing advanced, practice-oriented training. Authors highlight that the selection of practices and their validation should be revised on a regular basis, to be adapted in a timely manner to the current infectious honeybee disease situation, in order to build up a resilient and effective stock of practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra De Carolis & Adam J. Newmark & Jieun Kim & Junxia Song & Marco Pietropaoli & Veronica Manara & Andrea Gyorffy & Joseph Cazier & Giovanni Formato, 2024. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:393-:d:1349232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:393-:d:1349232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.