IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p343-d1343103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Symmetric Double Flat Fan Nozzles against Fusarium Head Blight in Durum Wheat

Author

Listed:
  • Filip Vučajnk

    (Department of Agronomy, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Valentina Spanic

    (Department of Small Cereal Crops Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural Institute Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia)

  • Stanislav Trdan

    (Department of Agronomy, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Iztok Jože Košir

    (Department for Agrochemistry and Brewing, Slovenian Institute of Hop Research and Brewing, 3310 Žalec, Slovenia)

  • Miha Ocvirk

    (Department for Agrochemistry and Brewing, Slovenian Institute of Hop Research and Brewing, 3310 Žalec, Slovenia)

  • Matej Vidrih

    (Department of Agronomy, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Four types of nozzles were tested on large-scale trials with a 40 m 2 plot unit size. The Avi Twin 110-01 (80 L ha −1 ), 110-02 (160 L ha −1 ), 110-03 (240 L ha −1 ), and 110-04 (320 L ha −1 ) symmetric double fan injector nozzles were tested during the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 growing seasons. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of spray nozzles with regard to deoxynivalenol (DON) accumulation in durum wheat grains. Artificial inoculation with Fusarium spp. was performed after durum heads were protected with fungicide. The percentage of heads covered with fungicide droplets, grain yield, yield-related traits, technological quality parameters, and concentrations of DON were determined. Compared to the control (without fungicide treatment), the Avi Twin 04 nozzle caused a reduction of 45.0% in the DON concentration on average across both growing seasons. This positively corresponded to the percentage of heads covered with fungicide droplets, which was highest when this nozzle was utilized. In both trial years, the DON reduction caused by the 110-04 twin nozzle was higher than that caused by the 110-01 nozzle. Treatment with the 110-04 nozzle more effectively improved the grain yield, 1000-kernel weight, and test weight compared to treatment with the 110-01 nozzle and the untreated control. The differences in technological quality were less pronounced when different spray nozzles were used.

Suggested Citation

  • Filip Vučajnk & Valentina Spanic & Stanislav Trdan & Iztok Jože Košir & Miha Ocvirk & Matej Vidrih, 2024. "Performance of Symmetric Double Flat Fan Nozzles against Fusarium Head Blight in Durum Wheat," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:343-:d:1343103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:343-:d:1343103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.