IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i11p2101-d1274714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evaluation of the Water Consumption and the Productive Parameters of a Table Grapevine, Cardinal Cultivar, Grafted onto Two Rootstocks

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Dattola

    (Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Vonella

    (Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Tommaso Olivadese

    (Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Francesco Maria Pullia

    (Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Rocco Zappia

    (Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Gregorio Gullo

    (Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

Abstract

This trial was carried out over two years in southern Italy. Two grapevine rootstocks, 110R and SO4, were compared to evaluate their ability to extract water from the soil and the effect on the yield and quality of the Cardinal grapevine table cultivar. Therefore, a new approach to plant water consumption based on sap flow was adopted. The earlier and faster water refilling of the xylem in Cardinal onto 110R (C/110R) appears responsible for the earlier evolution of the phenological phases than Cardinal onto SO4 (C/SO4). The maximum length of the principal shoot was reached in Cardinal/110R compared to the C/SO4, while a higher number of lateral shoots with lower internode changed the canopy architecture and light distribution in the C/SO4. The 110R used more water compared to the SO4. It was possible to quantify the real transpired flux of the plant per day: the sap flow was 12.3 L.plant −1 .d −1 and 11.7 L.plant −1 .d −1 in C/110R in the first and second year, respectively, while it was 14% lower in the alternative graft combination. The overall lower C/SO4 water status does not compromise the production result, with similar or higher-quality aspects compared to the alternative graft combination C/110R, which can be also attributed to the strong resilience of Cardinal to water deficit.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Dattola & Vincenzo Vonella & Tommaso Olivadese & Francesco Maria Pullia & Rocco Zappia & Gregorio Gullo, 2023. "The Evaluation of the Water Consumption and the Productive Parameters of a Table Grapevine, Cardinal Cultivar, Grafted onto Two Rootstocks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:2101-:d:1274714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/11/2101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/11/2101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:2101-:d:1274714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.