IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1298-d896823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa ) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Aviv Asher

    (Northern Agriculture R&D, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona P.O. Box 831, Israel)

  • Reut Dagan

    (Northern Agriculture R&D, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona P.O. Box 831, Israel)

  • Shmuel Galili

    (The Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Rishon LeZion P.O. Box 15159, Israel)

  • Lior Rubinovich

    (Northern Agriculture R&D, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona P.O. Box 831, Israel)

Abstract

Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd., Amaranthaceae) is an environmental stress-resilient crop of increasing global importance. Sowing density is a critical factor in the quinoa cultivation protocol. We evaluated the row-spacing effect on quinoa growth, yield, and grain quality under Mediterranean conditions. We hypothesized that lower row spacing would reduce quinoa stem diameter and increase yield but may reduce grain quality. Two quinoa accessions were sown in northern Israel with 16, 26, or 80 cm between rows during two consecutive years, in November and January each year. Plant density at harvest ranged from 22 to 260 plants m −2 . Plant height and stem diameter ranged from 77 to 126 and 6.3 to 10.5 cm, respectively. Hay, grain, and straw yield ranged from 2259 to 17,979, 1604 to 4266, and 1212 to 3660 kg DM ha −1 , respectively. Grain protein content (PC) ranged from 5.2 to 14.2 and thousand grain weight (TGW) from 2033 to 3446 mg. Plant density, hay, grain, and straw yield were negatively correlated to row spacing. Stem diameter was positively correlated to row spacing, while there were no correlations between this parameter and plant height, grain PC, or TGW. Results indicated that 16 cm between rows may be optimal, as this produced the greatest yields with no effect on grain quality. However, as it may result in plant lodging, 26 cm row spacing should also be considered. The effects of additional management-related parameters on quinoa production should be examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Aviv Asher & Reut Dagan & Shmuel Galili & Lior Rubinovich, 2022. "Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa ) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1298-:d:896823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Syed Riaz Ahmed & Zeba Ali & Iram Ijaz & Zafran Khan & Nimra Gul & Soha Pervaiz & Hesham F. Alharby & Daniel K. Y. Tan & Muhammad Sayyam Tariq & Maria Ghaffar & Amir Bibi & Khalid Rehman Hakeem, 2023. "Multi-Trait Selection of Quinoa Ideotypes at Different Levels of Cutting and Spacing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1298-:d:896823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.