IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i12p2133-d1000817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on Water Distribution and Droplet Kinetic Energy Intensity from Non-Circular Nozzles with Different Aspect Ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Zixin Wang

    (Research Centre of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Yue Jiang

    (Research Centre of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Jialing Liu

    (Research Centre of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Hong Li

    (Research Centre of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Hao Li

    (Institute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: In sprinkler irrigation systems, the water distribution and droplet kinetic energy are affected by the shape of the nozzle. In this paper, the effects of working pressure and aspect ratio (L/D ) of circular and non-circular nozzles (diamond and ellipse) on water distribution and droplet kinetic energy intensity were investigated; (2) Methods: The hydraulic performance of a PY15 impact sprinkler with circular and non-circular nozzles was assessed under different working pressures, and the droplet diameter, velocity, and kinetic energy intensity were measured by a 2D video disdrometer. Moreover, the coefficient of variation ( CV ) and form factor ( β ) were introduced to represent the water distribution and droplet characteristics; (3) Results: The results revealed that, under the same working pressure, the CV of the diamond nozzle was the smallest compared with that of the circular and elliptical nozzles, reflecting a more uniform water distribution. The uniformity of water distribution was the best when the L/D of the elliptical nozzle was the smallest. In general, the larger the outlet diameter, the larger the wetted radius and water application rate. In addition, the smaller the L/D , the smaller the peak water distribution value and the radial increase of the kinetic energy intensity of a single nozzle. The maximum droplet kinetic energy per unit volume of the elliptical nozzle was the smallest compared with that of the circular and diamond nozzles. The circular nozzle at 200 kPa and the diamond and elliptical nozzles at 100 kPa obtained the highest uniformity coefficients of combined kinetic energy intensity distribution, which were 55.93% (circular), 67.59% (diamond), and 57.78% (elliptical) when the combination spacings were 1.0 R, 1.1 R and 1.2 R, and 1.0 R, respectively. Finally, the fitting function of unit volume droplet kinetic energy, distance from the nozzle, L/D , and working pressure of non-circular nozzles was established, and a fitting coefficient of 0.92 was obtained, indicating that the fitting equation was accurate; (4) Conclusions: At low working pressures, the elliptic and diamond nozzles showed better water distributions than the circular nozzle. The distal average droplet diameters of the sprinkler with non-circular nozzles were found to be smaller than those produced by the circular nozzle.

Suggested Citation

  • Zixin Wang & Yue Jiang & Jialing Liu & Hong Li & Hao Li, 2022. "Experimental Study on Water Distribution and Droplet Kinetic Energy Intensity from Non-Circular Nozzles with Different Aspect Ratios," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2133-:d:1000817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vadim Bolshev & Vladimir Panchenko & Alexey Sibirev, 2023. "Engineering Innovations in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-4, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2133-:d:1000817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.