IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i6p245-d376181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Using an Alternative Bedding Composition on the Levels of Indicator Microorganisms and Mammary Health in Dairy Farm Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • František Zigo

    (Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Nad’a Sasáková

    (Veterinary Legislation and Economy, Department of the Environment, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Gabriela Gregová

    (Veterinary Legislation and Economy, Department of the Environment, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Jana Výrostková

    (Department of Milk Hygiene, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Silvia Ondrašovičová

    (Department of Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare an improved bedding composition with conventional straw bedding under farm conditions, regarding its effects on the influence of indicator microorganisms on the hygiene levels of cubicle floors and the occurrence of mastitis in dairy cows. Dairy cows were housed in newly built stalls divided into two parts, each with four subsections, and bedded cubicles arranged in three rows. Five stall subsections from each 9-bedded cubicle were selected for study, and 30 dairy cows were monitored according to the time intervals of bedding treatment for cubicles. In the first subsection (control), the cows were housed in bedded cubicles layered with straw up to a height of 20 cm. Sections 2–5 had alternative bedding (AB) as follows: fresh AB, AB 1 month old, AB 2 months old, and AB 3 months old, which were bedded one day before (fresh) and 1–3 months before the actual observation period, respectively. The alternative bedding per one cubicle consisted of ground limestone (100 kg), water (80 L), recycled manure solids (RMS; 15 kg), and straw (25 kg). After laying, the bedding was treated with a concrete selector to provide strength and sufficient resistance. A total of 180 bedding and 600 quarter milk samples were taken simultaneously from all five monitored subsections for microbiological determination. Comparing classical straw bedding with the alternate bedding showed a stabilizing effect by keeping the bedding thickness up to the floor barrier level, which had a beneficial effect by reducing the level of fecal contamination in the rear of the cubicle. Fecal coliforms and fecal streptococci were found to be reduced in one-day-old bedding as well as after the first, second, and third months. By evaluating the health status of the mammary glands, a positive effect was noted in reducing the occurrence of subclinical mastitis, which was reflected in a reduced number of infected quarters in the group of cows housed in cubicles for three months after use of improved bedding.

Suggested Citation

  • František Zigo & Nad’a Sasáková & Gabriela Gregová & Jana Výrostková & Silvia Ondrašovičová, 2020. "Effects of Using an Alternative Bedding Composition on the Levels of Indicator Microorganisms and Mammary Health in Dairy Farm Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:245-:d:376181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/6/245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Colantoni & Nicola Lacetera & Loredana Basiricò & Massimo Malacarne & Andrea Summer & Umberto Bernabucci, 2022. "Innovative Technologies for the Feeding of Dairy Cattle to Ensure Animal Welfare and Production Quality—INNOVALAT," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-4, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:6:p:245-:d:376181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.