IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i9p208-d1242694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Educators’ Soft Skills: Developing a Self-Assessment Instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Al-Sa’di

    (Teaching Innovation & Research, Te Pūkenga Whitireia and WelTec, Wellington 5010, New Zealand)

  • Parina Yamjal

    (Business Management Programme, Te Pūkenga Whitireia and WelTec, Wellington 5010, New Zealand)

  • Esraa Ahmad

    (School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand
    Healthcare Department, New Zealand Quality Research and Innovation, Auckland 4442, New Zealand)

  • Richa Panjabi

    (Information Technology Programmes, Te Pūkenga Whitireia and WelTec, Wellington 5010, New Zealand)

  • CAM Allott McPhee

    (Teaching Innovation & Research, Te Pūkenga Whitireia and WelTec, Wellington 5010, New Zealand)

  • Olkan Guler

    (Business Management Programme, Te Pūkenga Whitireia and WelTec, Wellington 5010, New Zealand)

Abstract

Educators play multifaceted roles in supporting students’ academic growth, necessitating a diverse knowledge base and a variety of soft skills. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about significant changes in the education environment, compelling educators to adapt to these new demands. Consequently, nurturing soft skills among educators has become crucial to effectively address evolving educational challenges. This paper presents the development and validation process of an online questionnaire aimed at measuring Te Pūkenga educators’ self-assessment of their soft skills before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaire comprises 28 Likert-type scale questions, encompassing 14 identified soft skills, alongside 6 additional questions on sociological and academic factors. A two-stage approach for questionnaire development and validation was used. In stage one, the questionnaire was created through a literature review and the identification of soft skills and independent variables. Stage two involved a content validity check by 10 educators and academic experts, leading to refinement based on their feedback. Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted with 50 random respondents to determine the validity and reliability of the instrument, and a preliminary data analysis was performed. The results of the validation process confirmed the questionnaire’s validity and reliability, as we hypothesised, indicating its potential as a useful research tool for a planned research project. Further research involving a broader range of tertiary institutions can enhance the scale’s validity and reliability, thereby strengthening its applicability to be utilised by diverse educational institutions and in diverse research settings to measure educators’ self-assessments of their acquired soft skills and self-evaluations of how challenging experiences and events in their professional environment influence the implementation of these skills. By embracing and fostering soft skills among educators, educational institutions can better equip their staff to meet the evolving demands and complexities of modern education.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Al-Sa’di & Parina Yamjal & Esraa Ahmad & Richa Panjabi & CAM Allott McPhee & Olkan Guler, 2023. "Assessing Educators’ Soft Skills: Developing a Self-Assessment Instrument," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:208-:d:1242694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/9/208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/9/208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:208-:d:1242694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.