IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i7p157-d1178176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conversation with ChatGPT about Digital Leadership and Technology Integration: Comparative Analysis Based on Human–AI Collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Turgut Karakose

    (Faculty of Education, Kutahya Dumlupınar University, 43100 Kütahya, Türkiye)

  • Murat Demirkol

    (Faculty of Education, Firat University, 23119 Elazığ, Türkiye)

  • Ramazan Yirci

    (Faculty of Education, Sutcuimam University, 46050 Kahramanmaras, Türkiye)

  • Hakan Polat

    (Faculty of Education, Firat University, 23119 Elazığ, Türkiye)

  • Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir

    (Faculty of Education, Firat University, 23119 Elazığ, Türkiye)

  • Tijen Tülübaş

    (Faculty of Education, Kutahya Dumlupınar University, 43100 Kütahya, Türkiye)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the ground-breaking innovations of the 21st century that has accelerated the digitalization of societies. ChatGPT is a newer form of AI-based large language model that can generate complex texts that are almost indistinguishable from human-generated text. It has already garnered substantial interest from people due to its potential utility in a variety of contexts. The current study was conducted to evaluate the utility of ChatGPT in generating accurate, clear, concise, and unbiased information that could support a scientific research process. To achieve this purpose, we initiated queries on both versions of ChatGPT regarding digital school leadership and teachers’ technology integration, two significant topics currently discussed in educational literature, under four categories: (1) the definition of digital leadership, (2) the digital leadership skills of school principals, (3) the factors affecting teachers’ technology integration, and (4) the impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration. Next, we performed a comparative analysis of the responses generated by ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4. The results showed that both versions were capable of providing satisfactory information compatible with the relevant literature. However, ChatGPT-4 provided more comprehensive and categorical information as compared to ChatGPT-3.5, which produced responses that were more superficial and short-cut. Although the results are promising in aiding the research process with AI-based technologies, we should also caution that, in their current form, these tools are still in their infancy, and there is a long way to go before they become fully capable of supporting scientific work. Meanwhile, it is significant that researchers continue to develop the relevant knowledge base to support the responsible, safe, and ethical integration of these technologies into the process of scientific knowledge creation, as Pandora’s box has already been opened, releasing newer opportunities and risks to be tackled.

Suggested Citation

  • Turgut Karakose & Murat Demirkol & Ramazan Yirci & Hakan Polat & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Tijen Tülübaş, 2023. "A Conversation with ChatGPT about Digital Leadership and Technology Integration: Comparative Analysis Based on Human–AI Collaboration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:157-:d:1178176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/7/157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/7/157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Stokel-Walker & Richard Van Noorden, 2023. "What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7947), pages 214-216, February.
    2. Fenglin Jia & Daner Sun & Qing Ma & Chee-Kit Looi, 2022. "Developing an AI-Based Learning System for L2 Learners’ Authentic and Ubiquitous Learning in English Language," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chong Lan & Yongsheng Wang & Chengze Wang & Shirong Song & Zheng Gong, 2023. "Application of ChatGPT-Based Digital Human in Animation Creation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Brady D. Lund & Ting Wang & Nishith Reddy Mannuru & Bing Nie & Somipam Shimray & Ziang Wang, 2023. "ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(5), pages 570-581, May.
    3. Manu Suvarna & Alain Claude Vaucher & Sharon Mitchell & Teodoro Laino & Javier Pérez-Ramírez, 2023. "Language models and protocol standardization guidelines for accelerating synthesis planning in heterogeneous catalysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Tomaž Kosar & Dragana Ostojić & Yu David Liu & Marjan Mernik, 2024. "Computer Science Education in ChatGPT Era: Experiences from an Experiment in a Programming Course for Novice Programmers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Kim, Jungkeun & Kim, Jeong Hyun & Kim, Changju & Park, Jooyoung, 2023. "Decisions with ChatGPT: Reexamining choice overload in ChatGPT recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:157-:d:1178176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.