Journalistic reportage vs. literary reportage. Diversion of reality towards propaganda during the proletcult time. Case study â€“ F. Brunea-Fox
AbstractOften named â€žliterary species of frontierâ€, sometimes â€žobligedâ€ to obey the rules of literary theory with arguments about narrative amplitude, elaborated style and author notoriety, the reportage originally was and still is to a great extent a journalistic genre. Essentially based on the construction rules imposed by the journalistic presentation of a real event, unchanged and unprocessed, but placed in a broader context so as to permit the analysis of causes and consequences, the portrayal of the actors, the analysis of their psychic. The author may appeal to introspection, using autoreferential style, occupying two positions, as a receiver and speaker for the public, conveying the emotions resulted from his implication in the event. Regarded as a star-journalist in the years 1930 â€“ 1937, F. Brunea-Fox would produce texts taken by the Romanian interwar mass-media as reference, characterized by an alert style, depth in the analysis of the social problems he approached, contextualization, and objectivity. The force of his texts can be quantified according to the responses of those targeted, especially the authorities of the time, extremely sensitive to press-transmitted messages. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate that the literary reportage was, at least in its years of glory â€“ the proletcult Ã©poque, an overstated propaganda resource. The effort to adapt of a journalist with the value of Brunea-Fox failed. In most of his later writings, Brunea-Fox refers to the journalistic reportage â€“ which he regards as worth being considered a literary species.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies – Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Jurnalism si Stiintele Comunicarii in its journal Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication.
Volume (Year): (2012)
Issue (Month): 3-4 ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Bdul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Corp A, etajul 6, sector 6, Bucuresti, cod 061071, Romania
Postal: Editura Ars Docendi, Sos. Panduri 94, sector 5, Bucuresti, Romania – for print copies
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Raluca Radu).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.