IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/35024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long Service Leave, the Labour Market, and Portability of Entitlements

Author

Listed:
  • Thornthwaite, L
  • Markey, R

Abstract

In this article we examine the case for the portability of long service leave (LSL) entitlements. Proliferating flexibility in employment arrangements increasingly leaves workers without coverage of employment provisions based on tenure with a single employer. An historical analysis of developments in LSL in Australia, including implementation of portable schemes in particular industries, and an analysis of labour-market trends are undertaken. We argue that the restriction of LSL to long-term employment with a single employer is anachronistic in the modern labour market. Nevertheless, LSL remains an important entitlement in the context of the contemporary labour market—perhaps more so than previously—even if the arguments in support of LSL have generally shifted in emphasis as a result of changes in the labour market. We conclude that a general entitlement to portable leave would deal with current inequities with respect to access to LSL. It would particularly assist in reconciling employers’ demands for flexibility with employees’ demands for protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Thornthwaite, L & Markey, R, 2014. "Long Service Leave, the Labour Market, and Portability of Entitlements," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 2-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:35024
    Note: Thornthwaite, L., Markey, R., 2014. Long Service Leave, the Labour Market, and Portability of Entitlements. Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol.40 No.1, pp. 2-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/35024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:35024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.