IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/27731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employment entitlements and casual status: Lessons from two Queensland cases

Author

Listed:
  • Whitehouse, G
  • Rooney, T

Abstract

"Casual status is commonly understood to exclude the entitlements associated with ongoing employment relationships. In Australia, however, the definition of casual employment has never been precise, and a high proportion of ‘casual’ positions are, in effect, regular forms of employment. Recent strategies to improve working conditions have thus sought to move beyond the typical Australian approach of applying a pay loading to compensate (partially) for lack of entitlements, towards attempts to extend some of the benefits of permanent status to more regular forms of casual employment. In this paper we examine two recent cases in Queensland that exemplify these contrasting strategies, highlighting the essential conflict between them, and the way it is compounded by the imprecise delineation of casuals in the Australian system. We note that both strategies are limited by the industrial relations context in which they are situated, and that additional entitlements may not be readily accessible in practice."

Suggested Citation

  • Whitehouse, G & Rooney, T, 2003. "Employment entitlements and casual status: Lessons from two Queensland cases," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 62-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:27731
    Note: Whitehouse, G., Rooney, T., 2003. Employment entitlements and casual status: Lessons from two Queensland cases. Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 62-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/27731
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:27731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.