IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fli/journl/26382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility?

Author

Listed:
  • Heron, A
  • Charlesworth, S

Abstract

Since the Labor Government’s election in 2007, debate around working-time flexibility has continued unabated. Employers argue that increasing employer-orientated flexibility through changes to minimum working-time standards and individual flexibility agreements is the path to enhanced productivity and a more effective economy. Unions and others have focused on the need for greater employee-orientated flexibility to facilitate combining work and care. However, on neither side of the debate has much attention been paid to basic principles that might inform working-time regulation in ways that would enable individual workers to manage their work and care responsibilities better and deliver a more sustainable and gender-equitable economy. The article outlines recent contestation around flexibility and argues that without ensuring adequate minimum working-time standards for all workers, the gendered divide around work and care will continue to be reinforced.

Suggested Citation

  • Heron, A & Charlesworth, S, 2012. "Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility?," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 214-233.
  • Handle: RePEc:fli:journl:26382
    Note: Heron, A. and Charlesworth, S., 2012. Working time and managing care under Labor: whose flexibility? Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 214-233.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26382
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ginny M Sargent & Julia McQuoid & Jane Dixon & Cathy Banwell & Lyndall Strazdins, 2021. "Flexible Work, Temporal Disruption and Implications for Health Practices: An Australian Qualitative Study," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(2), pages 277-295, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fli:journl:26382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rupali Saikia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nilflau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.