IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedhpw/y2010inov.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pre-implementation findings from the neighborhood stabilization program

Author

Listed:
  • Robin G. Newberger

Abstract

In 2009, states, counties and cities across the country applied for approximately $3.9 billion from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to confront the problems of foreclosures and property abandonment. The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) is the principal federal response to address the impact of foreclosed properties on neighborhoods. NSP provides federal grants to every state and certain local communities to purchase foreclosed or abandoned homes and rehabilitate, resell or redevelop them to stem the decline of values of neighboring homes. Under NSP1, HUD allocated the money to 308 eligible state and local governments (50 states plus 258 cities and counties). Direct entitlement grantees (those that received the funds directly from HUD) also had the authority to re-allocate these funds to other cities and towns that did not receive an NSP grant from HUD. ; This article analyzes the experiences of launching an NSP project at three NSP sites in the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's district. The sites are Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Lafayette, Indiana and the southern suburbs of Cook County, Illinois. At each of these sites, the local foreclosure problem was (self) described as \\"severe\\" and each received about the same amount of NSP funds to stabilize the impacted neighborhoods. But these sites were also a diverse group in terms of the geographic scope of their projects and the process by which they received NSP funding: Milwaukee was an entitlement city, Lafayette was a sub-grantee of the state of Indiana and the suburban Cook County program received its NSP1 funding from the county, which itself was a direct grantee from HUD.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin G. Newberger, 2010. "Pre-implementation findings from the neighborhood stabilization program," Profitwise, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Nov.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedhpw:y:2010:i:nov
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/profitwise_news_and_views/2010/PNV_Nov2010_SpotEd_web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Longworth, 2011. "Suburban housing collaborative: a case for interjurisdictional collaboration," Profitwise, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Nov.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Foreclosure; Housing - Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedhpw:y:2010:i:nov. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lauren Wiese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.