IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/feddel/y2013iaprnv.8no.2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When gauging bank capital adequacy, simplicity beats complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Seamans

Abstract

It is unclear whether ratio complexity enhances the ability to identify failure and is better than a simpler ratio. But a simpler ratio offers the benefits of greater transparency and accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Seamans, 2013. "When gauging bank capital adequacy, simplicity beats complexity," Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, vol. 8(2), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:feddel:y:2013:i:apr:n:v.8no.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/6362/item/607678
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Connel Fullenkamp & Ms. Celine Rochon, 2014. "Reconsidering Bank Capital Regulation: A New Combination of Rules, Regulators, and Market Discipline," IMF Working Papers 2014/169, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Javid Iqbal & Khalid Riaz, 2022. "Predicting future financial performance of banks from management’s tone in the textual disclosures," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2691-2721, August.
    3. Javid Iqbal, 2019. "Managerial Self-Attribution Bias and Banks’ Future Performance: Evidence from Emerging Economies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-32, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk assessment;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:feddel:y:2013:i:apr:n:v.8no.2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Chapman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbdaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.