IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fec/journl/v2y2007i3p289-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare effects of public health insurance reform: The case of urban China

Author

Listed:
  • DING Jihong

    (School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • ZHU Minglai

    (School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

This paper evaluates Chinese public health insurance reform enforced since 1998 in terms of its welfare effects. We evaluate China health insurance reform since 1998 using the China Health and Nutrition Surveys (CHNS) data with relevant econometric models. The results of empirical studies show that the public health insurance status has significant impact on medical service utilization and expenditure. The reform reduces the positive effect of public health insurance on medical service utilization, meaning the utilization gap is narrowed after the reform. However, the empirical studies find that the medical expenditure growth of the sample individuals in urban China has not been controlled after the Basic Medical Insurance (BMI) program even if a new co-payment is enforced. Two main reasons for this failure might be the rising cost of medical service and physician's severe moral hazard, while both of them come from no managed care mechanism for medical service providers in China.

Suggested Citation

  • DING Jihong & ZHU Minglai, 2007. "Welfare effects of public health insurance reform: The case of urban China," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 2(3), pages 289-323, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:fec:journl:v:2:y:2007:i:3:p:289-323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/10.1007/s11459-007-0016-y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    health insurance reform; medical service expenditure; medical service utilization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fec:journl:v:2:y:2007:i:3:p:289-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Frank H. Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.