Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Public Debt Policy: Credibility and Institutions


Author Info

  • Petr Pavelek
Registered author(s):


    The paper considers modern frameworks of public debt management from a credibility perspective. It focuses on the institutional and operational arrangements of effective debt management. In particular, the author seeks to shed light upon the contemporary problems of Czech debt manager compared with OECD and EU debt managers. The author calls for a broader public debate of public debt management in the Czech Republic, citing the country?s increasing level of public debt and accession to the EU and EMU. The author suggests establishing a public debt-management office within the organizational structure of the Czech Ministry of Finance. It would functionally operate independent of both the ministry and the central bank. This is a crucial condition toward strengthening the credibility of Czech debt management and economic policy, the author concludes.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences in its journal Finance a uver - Czech Journal of Economics and Finance.

    Volume (Year): 53 (2003)
    Issue (Month): 5-6 (May)
    Pages: 190-219

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:fau:fauart:v:53:y:2003:i:5-6:p:190-219

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Opletalova 26, CZ-110 00 Prague
    Phone: +420 2 222112330
    Fax: +420 2 22112304
    Web page:
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: accountability; central bank; credibility problem; debt agency; finance ministry; institutional framework; public debt management; transparency;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:fauart:v:53:y:2003:i:5-6:p:190-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lenka Herrmannova).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.