IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rules and Practices of Forensic Experts in the Field of Civil or Criminal Law

Author

Listed:
  • Sedat Krasniqi

    (PhD. College, “FAMA†Pristina, Prizren, Mitrovica, Gjilan, Faculty of Law - CriminalisticAssociation of Forensic Sciences - Center for Forensic Science Expertise Executive Director, Criminalistic - Forensic Expert, Republic of Kosovo.)

Abstract

The process of conducting an examination (by the expert) ends - de facto, with the submission of a written report (the act of expertise) to the court, while - de jure, it is considered to have been completed only when the question and answer session it is held before the court. Although in actual practice it is found that there are generally no strict requirements regarding the structure of the expert acts, the statement of facts, supporting evidence, their analysis and justification of the expert's approach to the conclusions reached are indispensable, both for the court and the parties, to appreciate the value of the expert's opinion and why not, to professionally list the expert in relation to other specialists in the field. Paragraph 1 of Article 230 of the Code of Civil Procedure clearly states that "The opinion of the expert must be reasoned".

Suggested Citation

  • Sedat Krasniqi, 2019. "Rules and Practices of Forensic Experts in the Field of Civil or Criminal Law," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:477
    DOI: 10.26417/265mfr78t
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms/article/view/6108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejms_v4_i3_19/Krasniqi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/265mfr78t?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.