IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving ‘Quality’ in Education: is Spending Effectively Better than Spending More?

Author

Listed:
  • Cusrow J. Dubash

    (Professor Department of Education Forman Christian College Lahore)

  • Umair Jamal

Abstract

The right to basic education is considered a fundamental human right. The provision of quality education for all children is the responsibility of the state. Article 25A of Pakistan's 1973 constitution says that "The state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children." In Pakistan, the government of Punjab has taken steps to ensure that all school going children attend school. Moreover, the provincial government has also made efforts to improve the quality of education through a number of interventions, such as improving infrastructure and work conditions, introducing smaller classrooms, provision of free textbooks, real-time monitoring of schools performance and giving children scholarships or other incentives to encourage their families to send them to school. Nevertheless, the principal question remains: Is the Pakistani state employing its resources efficiently to ensure that the quality of education is adequately improved? For instance, the government in Punjab invests almost 18 percent of its annual budget on education but still, the quality of public education system remains a challenge. The government has tried to digitize Punjab's entire public school system in order to monitor key outcomes. However, it’s just a first step toward getting to an education system where the teaching and learning experience are revamped through the integration of different Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Moreover, the government has taken steps to introduce reforms to the current curriculum which mainly focuses on rote learning. A syllabus which encourages and focuses on evocative learning should be at the centerpiece of the student experience (Jamal, 2017). On the whole, this paper argues that Punjab needs to spend effectively and efficiently rather than spending more in order to resolve its educational crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Cusrow J. Dubash & Umair Jamal, 2018. "Improving ‘Quality’ in Education: is Spending Effectively Better than Spending More?," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, January -.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:376
    DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v7i1.p167-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms/article/view/6007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejms_v3_i1_18/Cusrow.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejms.v7i1.p167-171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena P. Antonacopoulou, 2001. "The Paradoxical Nature of The Relationship Between Training and Learning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 327-350, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikos Bozionelos & Cai-Hui (veronica) Lin & Kin Yi Lee, 2020. "Enhancing the sustainability of employees' careers through training : The roles of career actors' openness and of supervisor support," Post-Print hal-02312413, HAL.
    2. Poula Helth, 2019. "Aesthetic-based competences lead to a sustainable learning practice," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(6), pages 607-617, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.