IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejlsjr/259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is Locke's Linguistic Theory Still Current and Interesting Today?

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Prato

    (Department of Political and Cognitive Social Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy)

Abstract

In the Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), Locke set out to offer an analysis of the human mind and its acquisition of knowledge still very current and important today. Locke offered also an empiricist theory according to which we acquire ideas through our experience of the world. The article examines Locke’s views on language and his principal innovation in the field of linguistic theory, represented by the recognition of the power of language with respect to the classification of the world, and its relative independence from reality. In particular the following topics are discussed: a) the polemical contrast with Cartesian philosophy b) the criticism that Locke levels against innatism c) the function of abstraction of the mind d) the concept of semiotics as a theory of thought and its expression e) the radical concept of arbitrariness f) the pragmatic factor intrinsic to Locke’s linguistics described as “communicational scepticism†.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Prato, 2022. "Why is Locke's Linguistic Theory Still Current and Interesting Today?," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, July -Dec.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:259
    DOI: 10.26417/ejls.v5i3.p29-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls/article/view/5401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v8_i2_22/Prato.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejls.v5i3.p29-36?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejlsjr:259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.