Terras públicas, ocupação privada: elementos para a história comparada da apropriação territorial na Argentina e no Brasil
AbstractThe question as to how much of the conomic backwardness of Latin-American countries such as Argentina and Brazil can in some extent be attributed to the agrarian land structures set up in the middle of the nineteenth century constitutes the main motivation of this paper. Concentration of land ownership has been one of the most permanent characteristics of both countries and traditional historiography customarily attributes the cause of the predominance of large landholdings (latifundia) to agrarian legislation sometimes inherited of the colonial epoch. We have tried to scrutinize this affirmation by distinguishing the historical origin of the latifundia from the reasons for its maintenance as the model of territorial occupation throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Our argument is that land legislation was an instrument utilized by the national states in the nineteenth century to direct the advance of the frontier in a way that made viable: 1) the incorporation of indigenous lands, a movement that mobilized vast human and material resources in the case of Argentina; 2) that the process of appropriation of new lands did not escape the control of the traditional dominant classes in spite of some experiments with colonization centred in family-owned farms carried out in both countries. Along with the similar features of land occupation and appropriation pointed out we tried to stress the differences that strongly contrasts the Brazilian case: a) greater degree of complexity; b) diminished participation of the state in the occupation process; c) heterogeneity of the landholders due to the marked regional differences; d) the considerable amount of public land which extended the frontier process late in the twentieth century; e) the place reserved to squatting, recourse utilized in all regions of the Country in all times.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) in its journal Revista Economia e Sociedade.
Volume (Year): 12 (1999)
Issue (Month): (January)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Caixa Postal: 6135 - CEP 13083-970, Campinas - SP - Brasil
Phone: (019) 788-5726
Fax: (019) 289-1512
Web page: http://www.eco.unicamp.br/
More information through EDIRC
Landholding; Agrarian legislation; Brazil ? Frontier; Argentina ? Frontier.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antonio Carlos Macedo e Silva).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.