IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ete/revbec/20040207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Market Regulation. Policy Lessons from other Disciplines Conclusions

Author

Listed:
  • A. Reitsman
  • S. Raes
  • E. Schieman
  • P. Van Winden

Abstract

Other disciplines increase our knowledge of when and how markets can be relied on to bring about optimal outcomes. They thereby make a significant contribution to the fine tuning of market regulation policies. Sometimes such fine tuning is in clear focused and well developed information strategies. For instance when limited consumer motivation and limited capacity to discern quality differences between competitors deem policies that simply increase the availability of information less effective; Or in the instance that increased transparency may lead to tacit collusion. Sometimes the fine tuning is in acknowledging that there is scope for increased reliance on implicit contracts or reputation mechanisms and in developing structures to foster such reliance. But most of all perhaps, the studies show that it is not only our understanding of to how to reach the social optimum, but also of what constitutes it, that may need to be regauged.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Reitsman & S. Raes & E. Schieman & P. Van Winden, 2004. "Rethinking Market Regulation. Policy Lessons from other Disciplines Conclusions," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 375-385.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20040207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://feb.kuleuven.be/rebel/jaargangen/2001-2010/2004/TEM2004-2/TEM%2004_2_7_RIETSMA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20040207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.