IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxvy2022i3p517-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualization of Smart Ports

Author

Listed:
  • Adrianna Karas

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to analyze how smart seaports are presented in the literature and source materials, as well as the existing discrepancy in the interpretation of this concept in terms of imprecision, arbitrariness in assigning characteristics to them, and the lack of a conceptual framework for this definition. Design/Methodology/Approach: A literature review was used to generate a representative pool of definitions of the Smart port concept from among searches in electronic scientific databases. In addition, a content analysis of the definitions was conducted to identify activities, tools, technologies and key attributes associated with smart ports. Findings: The presented review of literature and source materials confirmed the lack of a standard and documented definition of smart ports, which at the same time makes it impossible to establish indicators for assessing the degree of implementation of the smart port concept in seaports and their evaluation to date is subjective. Practical Implications: The literature review showed how important it is to systematize knowledge and definitions of smart ports in order to be able to create a common tool for assessing the level of maturity of smart seaports. Originality/Value: To date, there is no extensive research on the conceptualization of smart ports, and case studies of ports implementing the smart port concept in their assessment appear in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrianna Karas, 2022. "Conceptualization of Smart Ports," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 517-525.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:3:p:517-525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3047/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Slawomir Skiba & Adrianna Karas, 2022. "The Changing Role of a Freight Forwarder in Modern Supply Chains," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 341-351.
    2. Robert Philipp, 2020. "Digital readiness index assessment towards smart port development," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 49-60, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Li, Kevin X. & Li, Mengchi & Zhu, Yuhan & Yuen, Kum Fai & Tong, Hao & Zhou, Haoqing, 2023. "Smart port: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Alaa Othman & Sara El-gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Evgeny V. Popov & Viktoria L. Simonova & Vitalii V. Cherepanov, 2021. "Digital maturity levels of an industrial enterprise," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 22(2), pages 88-109, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovations; intelligent port; new technologies; smart port.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxv:y:2022:i:3:p:517-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.