IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behind the Copenhagen façade. The meaning and structure of the Copenhagen political criterion of democracy and the rule of law

Author

Listed:
  • Kochenov, Dimitry

Abstract

The paper makes an attempt to map the Copenhagen criterion of democracy and the rule of law, one of the main instruments governing the biggest enlargement in the Union history. The meaning of it, however, is still as vague today as it was more than ten years ago, at the time of introduction of the criterion. How should democracy and rule of law be interpreted in the context of enlargement? What exactly is required of the candidate countries in order to meet this criterion? Based on the analysis of the documents released by the European Commission, the Council of Ministers and the European Council in the course of the application of the criteria and taking the experience of the previous enlargements into account, the paper outlines the core structure of the criterion and assesses the degree of change brought to the enlargement regulation by the conditionality policy applied by the Union. The paper concludes that the assessment of democracy and the rule of law criterion was not really full, consistent and impartial and that the threshold to meet this criterion was very low. As a result, the Commission failed to establish a link between the actual stage of reform in the candidate countries and the acknowledgement that the Copenhagen political criteria are met.

Suggested Citation

  • Kochenov, Dimitry, 2004. "Behind the Copenhagen façade. The meaning and structure of the Copenhagen political criterion of democracy and the rule of law," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 8, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-010a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-010.htm
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-010.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J.H.H. Weiler, 1997. "The Reformation of European Constitutionalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 97-131, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bojinović Fenko Ana & Urlić Ana, 2015. "Political Criteria vs. Political Conditionality: Comparative analysis of Slovenian and Croatian European Union accession processes," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 107-137, February.
    2. Dimitry V. Kochenov & Petra Bárd, 2022. "Kirchberg Salami Lost in Bosphorus: The Multiplication of Judicial Independence Standards and the Future of the Rule of Law in Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 150-165, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leibfried, Stephan, 1998. "Spins of (dis)integration: What might 'reformers' in Canada learn from the 'social dimension' of the European Union?," Working papers of the ZeS 06/1998, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    2. Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca, 2000. "The Political Basis of Support for European Integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 147-171, June.
    3. Johann Robert Basedow, 2022. "Why de‐judicialize? Explaining state preferences on judicialization in World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body and Investor‐to‐State Dispute Settlement reforms," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1362-1381, October.
    4. Joerges, Christian & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, 2016. "Europe and European studies in crisis: Inter-disciplinary and intra-disciplinary schisms in legal and political science," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2016-109, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.