IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epc/journl/v19y2024i1p5-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sources of inefficiency in the procurement of major weapon systems. Estimates for the German case

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Brzoska

    (Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to provide a rough estimate of inefficiencies in German major weapons procurement. It is possible to derive estimates of procurement inefficiencies for 2022 programs—arising from a failure to exploit economies of scale, the complexity of co-production projects, cost overruns and time delays, and low weapon utilization rates. As the necessary data is only partly available to the public, these estimates rely on several assumptions and so are presented as ranges. This article identifies two main causes of symptoms of inefficiency in German major weapons procurement: (a) technological requirements beyond the reach of arms producers at the time decisions on procurements were made, and (b) protectionism, i.e. the favoring of national arms producers. Overall, it is estimated that German taxpayers could have been spared a least a third of total procurement costs had these inefficiencies been avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Brzoska, 2024. "Sources of inefficiency in the procurement of major weapon systems. Estimates for the German case," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 5-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:epc:journl:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:5-22
    DOI: 10.15355/epsj.19.1.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.epsjournal.org.uk/index.php/EPSJ/article/view/393
    Download Restriction: Open access 24 months after original publication.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15355/epsj.19.1.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    arms; procurement; efficiency; Germany;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epc:journl:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:5-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Brown, Managing Editor, EPSJ (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecaarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.