IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/env/journl/ev23ev2329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alien Invasive Species Management: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Barents Sea King Crab

Author

Listed:
  • Jannike Falk-Petersen

Abstract

The alien invasive Red King Crab in the Barents Sea represents both a threat, via ecosystem impacts, and a gain as a revenue source from food sales. Uncertainties exist regarding the ecological impacts but debate in Norway has also emphasised the economic benefits to marginalised fisher communities. This paper reports on a Q-methodology study involving key stakeholders to probe the extent to which divisions exist between different groups. While divisions are indeed found and two groupings identified, these are not as clear as suggested by the lines typically portrayed in the media and elsewhere -, i.e. economic gains versus ecological preservation. Stakeholder groups reported here generally agreed that biodiversity concerns should be central and that further invasion was undesirable due to potential impacts on ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Jannike Falk-Petersen, 2014. "Alien Invasive Species Management: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Barents Sea King Crab," Environmental Values, White Horse Press, vol. 23(6), pages 701-725, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:env:journl:ev23:ev2329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2014/00000023/00000006/art00006
    Download Restriction: downloads of articles require payment or registration of paid subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Alien invasive species; resource management; Q-methodology; stakeholder perceptions; fisheries; Norway;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D46 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Value Theory
    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:env:journl:ev23:ev2329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrew Johnson (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.whpress.co.uk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.