IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/srjpps/v9y2013i4p571-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative picture of corporate social responsibility approaches by leading companies in the United Kingdom and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Mônica Cavalcanti Sá Abreu
  • Claire Barlow

Abstract

Purpose - – This paper aims to compare the CSR strategy, stakeholder engagement and overseas approaches of six leading companies that have large potential environmental and social impacts, influential stakeholders and notable CSR actions. Design/methodology/approach - – This is an exploratory survey based on interviews with senior executives from British and Brazilian companies operating in the steel, petroleum and retail sectors, that makes comparisons between and within them. Findings - – The British companies interviewed are more rule-based, adopt an implicit CSR approach, react to stakeholders' demands based on moral motives, and focus on environmental issues. The Brazilian companies reviewed in this study adopt an explicit CSR approach, have relational motives to engage with stakeholders, and are more concerned with building a responsible image and narrowing social gaps. Research limitations/implications - – The survey is based on the perceptions of the senior executives interviewed, which may or may not correspond to actual practices. The sample size restricts generalisation of the results, and the specific firms interviewed may not represent the prevailing CSR business strategy in their respective countries. Practical implications - – British companies can learn from the Brazilian experience how to become more innovative in a broader approach to CSR. Brazil should reinforce its legal framework to provide a more systematic and rule-based approach to CSR, close to the UK experience. Originality/value - – The way CSR is conceived and implemented depends on the ethical, socioeconomic, legal and institutional environment of the country in which the firm operates.

Suggested Citation

  • Mônica Cavalcanti Sá Abreu & Claire Barlow, 2013. "A comparative picture of corporate social responsibility approaches by leading companies in the United Kingdom and Brazil," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 571-588, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:4:p:571-588
    DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0046/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0046/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SRJ-04-2012-0046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mazboudi, Mohamad & Sidani, Yusuf M. & Al Ariss, Akram, 2020. "Harmonization of firm CSR policies across national contexts: Evidence from Brazil & Sweden," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    2. Ruth Zárate-Rueda & Claudia Lisbeth Vélez-Hernández & José Alonso Caballero-Márquez, 2021. "Socio-environmental conflicts resulting from extractive activities in Latin America and Corporate Social Responsibility," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 37(161), pages 668-679, October.
    3. Francisco González Santa Cruz & Iliana Loor Alcívar & Nelly Moreira Mero & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of the Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 517-534, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:srjpps:v:9:y:2013:i:4:p:571-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.