IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/sampjp/sampj-01-2022-0012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The diffusion of the sustainable development goals (SDGs): an examination of preparer perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Gloria Oforiwaa Botchway
  • Oliver James Bradley

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to analyse the adoption of sustainable development goals (SDGs) disclosure via the lens of the diffusion of innovations theory, legitimacy theory and the theory of planned behaviour and presents insights into perceptions held by preparers on their decision to adopt or reject SDG disclosure. Design/methodology/approach - This paper uses a mixed-methods approach, combining content and statistical analysis as well as interviews, to examine SDG disclosure and preparer perceptions. Findings - The analysis reveals low, but growing SDG disclosure. Although SDG disclosure is perceived as relatively advantageous for a variety of reasons, perceptions of incompatibility and complexity may limit diffusion of SDG disclosure. Trialability and observability of SDG disclosure, on the other hand, may support or hinder the decision to adopt or reject SDG disclosure. Research limitations/implications - Findings generated may not be generalisable across all populations. A smaller sample of companies were interviewed. Practical implications - This paper offers insight into attitudes which must be altered if greater diffusion of SDG disclosure is to be achieved by the United Nations 2030 deadline. Social implications - Sustainability reporting (SR) has a pivotal role to play in supporting the achievement of the SDGs, and innovations in accounting and reporting are particularly needed. This paper raises issues that should be considered by both preparers and practitioners, if innovations are to succeed. Originality/value - This paper contributes the application of an underutilised theoretical framework in SR research, the first longitudinal analysis of the diffusion of SDG disclosure to provide evidence of adoption over time and an extension of similar studies on diffusion of reporting innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gloria Oforiwaa Botchway & Oliver James Bradley, 2023. "The diffusion of the sustainable development goals (SDGs): an examination of preparer perceptions," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 289-312, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-01-2022-0012
    DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0012/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0012/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thanya Weerasinghe & Dileepa Samudrage & Nuwan Gunarathne, 2023. "The influence of top management team diversity on Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) reporting: Evidence from Sri Lanka," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5922-5934, December.
    2. Giacomo Pigatto & Miriam Corrado & Lino Cinquini & Maria Serena Chiucchi & Andrea Tenucci, 2023. "Integrare gli SDG nella valutazione degli investimenti aziendali: risultati da un approccio interventista," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2), pages 69-91.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-01-2022-0012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.