IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rbfpps/v8y2016i1p39-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The equity premium puzzle: new evidence on the optimal holding period and optimal asset allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Evanthia Zervoudi
  • Spyros Spyrou

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to report new original evidence on optimal holding periods and optimal asset allocations (Benartzi and Thaler, 1995). Design/methodology/approach - – The authors employ a number of different value functions, a recent dataset, different markets, and varying investment horizons. Findings - – The authors report original evidence across markets and over-time, employing different value functions and varying investment horizons. The results results indicate that, during the past decades, the optimal holding period (seven months during the whole period and four/five months during crises) is not affected by the value function employed, is in accordance with the Myopic Loss Aversion hypothesis, is consistent across markets, but is sensitive to economic crises and shorter to that reported in Benartzi and Thaler (12 months). The optimal asset allocation is also different to that of Benartzi and Thaler during crises periods and/or assuming value functions with probability distortion. Originality/value - – The paper employs a number of different value functions, with and without probability distortion; it compares investor behavior in three important international markets (USA, UK, Germany); as a further robustness test the authors use various investment horizons.

Suggested Citation

  • Evanthia Zervoudi & Spyros Spyrou, 2016. "The equity premium puzzle: new evidence on the optimal holding period and optimal asset allocation," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 39-57, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:39-57
    DOI: 10.1108/RBF-12-2014-0052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-12-2014-0052/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-12-2014-0052/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RBF-12-2014-0052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fujii, Yoichiro & Nakamura, Yutaka, 2021. "Regret-sensitive equity premium," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 302-307.
    2. Binghui Wu & Tingting Duan & Jianmin He, 2018. "Dynamics Evolution of Trading Strategies of Investors in Financial Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 743-760, April.
    3. Jinesh Jain & Nidhi Walia & Simarjeet Singh & Esha Jain, 2022. "Mapping the field of behavioural biases: a literature review using bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 823-855, September.
    4. Binghui Wu & Tingting Duan, 2019. "Nonlinear Dynamics Characteristic of Risk Contagion in Financial Market Based on Agent Modeling and Complex Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.