IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rafpps/v7y2008i2p121-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance measurement for accountability in corporate governance

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsan H. Feroz
  • Sanjay Goel
  • Raymond L. Raab

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the applicability of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in arriving at an unbiased account of relative performance in a set of companies, using the pharmaceutical industry as an example. Design/methodology/approach - A DEA‐based income efficiency measure of business performance for the pharmaceutical industry is computed. The pharmaceutical industry, which includes many multinational corporations with complex governance problems, and the strategies that allowed firm efficiency rankings to change over time, over ten recent years, are analyzed. Findings - The analyses indicate that the inclines and declines in DEA efficiency rankings are related to the strategic choices made by the upper management. Research limitations/implications - The paper attempted to trace firm behaviorpost hocto validate the DEA rankings. All relevant firm behavior may not have been captured; the paper only attempted to capture behavior reported in the respectable business press, which may introduce a bias. Practical implications - The approach may be ideal to evaluate strategic managers (CEOs, general managers, and presidents) by board of directors, since it relates multiple performance indices to a meta‐measure of performance. Another group of beneficiaries include sector financial analysts. The approach adds a new dimension to sector analysis, to compare specific industries and identify the relative rankings of firms on multiple performance indices. Originality/value - The paper demonstrates the usefulness of DEA in performance governance measurement by applying it to the pharmaceuticals industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsan H. Feroz & Sanjay Goel & Raymond L. Raab, 2008. "Performance measurement for accountability in corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 121-130, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:7:y:2008:i:2:p:121-130
    DOI: 10.1108/14757700810874100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14757700810874100/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14757700810874100/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/14757700810874100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ender BAYKUT & Fatih ECER & Ismail KARA, 2016. "A DEA-MALMQUIST Index Application to Analyze Inefficiency Reasons of BIST Corporate Governance Index Companies," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 14-24.
    2. Li Sun & Marty Stuebs, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 251-263, December.
    3. Hsueh-Li Huang & Lien-Wen Liang & Hai-Yen Chang & Hsiu-Yuan Hsu, 2021. "The Influence of Earnings Management and Board Characteristics on Company Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:7:y:2008:i:2:p:121-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.