IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/qrfmpp/qrfm-04-2017-0039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design, qualification andShariahgovernance of stock screening methodologies in selected Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries in comparison with the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Umayal Kasi
  • Junaina Muhammad

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to compare and analyse the aspects ofShariahscreening methodologies within the selected Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries as well as comparing the methodologies with the USA, and to examine howShariahscreening methodologies affect financing and investing activities of a firm. Design/methodology/approach - Shariahscreening methodologies within the selected GCC countries and between the GCC countries and the USA are compared on the basis of the data collected from secondary sources. Findings - Design, qualification andShariahgovernance set theShariahscreening methodologies within the GCC countries apart. Feasibility, duration, economic viability and funds required differentiate theseShariahscreening methodologies between the GCC countries and the USA.Shariahscreening methodologies implied in the USA is more stringent than in the GCC countries. Research limitations/implications - The suggestions in this study include using a longer research timeline, examining many more number of countries’Shariahscreening methodologies and exploring other types ofShariahscreening methodologies. Practical implications - The possibility of generalising the implementation of strict and uniformShariahscreening methodologies across all the country-specificShariahindices amongst Muslim nations, globally, is likely to benefit all the Muslim countries, by strengthening the understanding, interaction and economic co-operation amongst these countries. Social implications - People’s needs can be tended to ifMaqasid Al-Shariah(objectives ofShariah) is achieved through flexibility, dynamism and creativity within the social policy. Originality/value - Aspects ofShariahscreening methodologies are compared and contrasted within the selected GCC countries as well as between the GCC countries and the United States and the role ofShariahscreening methodologies is examined in order to determine the extent of what isShariah-Compliant and what is Non-ShariahCompliant for a firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Umayal Kasi & Junaina Muhammad, 2018. "Design, qualification andShariahgovernance of stock screening methodologies in selected Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries in comparison with the United States," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 189-209, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:qrfmpp:qrfm-04-2017-0039
    DOI: 10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0039/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0039/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghlamallah, Ezzedine & Alexakis, Christos & Dowling, Michael & Piepenbrink, Anke, 2021. "The topics of Islamic economics and finance research," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-160.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrfmpp:qrfm-04-2017-0039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.