IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/omjpps/omj-12-2018-0654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do you pass it on? An examination of the consequences of perceived cyber incivility

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly McCarthy
  • Jone L. Pearce
  • John Morton
  • Sarah Lyon

Abstract

Purpose - The emerging literature on computer-mediated communication at the study lacks depth in terms of elucidating the consequences of the effects of incivility on employees. This study aims to compare face-to-face incivility with incivility encountered via e-mail on both task performance and performance evaluation. Design/methodology/approach - In two experimental studies, the authors test whether exposure to incivility via e-mail reduces individual task performance beyond that of face-to-face incivility and weather exposure to that incivility results in lower performance evaluations for third-parties. Findings - The authors show that being exposed to cyber incivility does decrease performance on a subsequent task. The authors also find that exposure to rudeness, both face-to-face and via e-mail, is contagious and results in lower performance evaluation scores for an uninvolved third party. Originality/value - This research comprises an empirically grounded study of incivility in the context of e-mail at study, highlights distinctions between it and face-to-face rudeness and reveals the potential risks that cyber incivility poses for employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly McCarthy & Jone L. Pearce & John Morton & Sarah Lyon, 2020. "Do you pass it on? An examination of the consequences of perceived cyber incivility," Organization Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 43-58, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-12-2018-0654
    DOI: 10.1108/OMJ-12-2018-0654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OMJ-12-2018-0654/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OMJ-12-2018-0654/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/OMJ-12-2018-0654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-12-2018-0654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.