IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/omjpps/omj-09-2020-1029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media and recruitment: examining (counter) productive diversity messages

Author

Listed:
  • Robyn Brouer
  • Rebecca Badawy
  • Michael Stefanone

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to explore the consequences of inconsistent diversity-related signals for job seekers. Information sources include strategically crafted corporate signals and independent sources. The authors seek to understand the effect of inconsistent diversity signals on job seekers attitudes and behavior during recruitment. Design/methodology/approach - An experiment was conducted wherein two samples from job-seeking populations were first exposed to a fictitious corporate website and then to LinkedIn profiles of that organization’s employees, with systematically varied diversity signals. Findings - Results demonstrated that conflicting diversity signals had negative effects on perceived organizational attractiveness in the student sample (N= 427) and on organizational agreeableness in the working sample (N= 243). Negative organizational attraction was related to a lower likelihood of participants applying. Practical implications - This work provides a stark but an important message to practitioners: signaling diversity-related values on corporate websites may backfire for organizations that actually lack diversity. Originality/value - Few studies have combined communication theories with recruitment to examine the link between diversity signals and inconsistent information gathered via social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Robyn Brouer & Rebecca Badawy & Michael Stefanone, 2021. "Social media and recruitment: examining (counter) productive diversity messages," Organization Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 34-43, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-09-2020-1029
    DOI: 10.1108/OMJ-09-2020-1029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OMJ-09-2020-1029/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OMJ-09-2020-1029/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/OMJ-09-2020-1029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-09-2020-1029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.